Mini Countryman 2014 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Mini Countryman is more dynamic to drive. Mini Countryman engine produces 33 HP more power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Nissan Juke. Thanks to more power Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.9 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Countryman could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Juke gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Juke 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mini Countryman is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mini Countryman is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | 830 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mini Countryman has 99 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Juke. The Nissan Juke may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mini Countryman (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Juke scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |