Mini Countryman 2010 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Mini Countryman engine produces 78 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Mini Countryman reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.5 | |
|
The Mini Countryman is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Countryman consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Mini Countryman over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 47 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller. Mini Countryman is 26 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Countryman is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Mini Countryman has 200 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`875 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mini Countryman is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |