Mini Countryman 2010 vs Mini Countryman 2014

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mini Countryman
2010 - 2014
Mini Countryman
2014 - 2016
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 218 HP90 - 218 HP
Torque: 153 - 305 NM153 - 305 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7 - 13.9 seconds6.9 - 13.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.4 - 7.74.2 - 7.5
Mini Countryman 2010 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mini Countryman 2014. On average, Mini Countryman 2010 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman 2014.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 149 mm (5.9 inches)130 - 150 mm (5.1 - 5.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Countryman 2010 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.10 m4.11 m
Width: 1.79 m1.79 m
Height: 1.56 m1.56 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mini Countryman 2010 and Mini Countryman 2014 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 350 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1170 litres1170 litres
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.6 meters
Gross weight: ~ 1`806 kg~ 1`860 kg
Net weight:~ 1`337 kg~ 1`340 kg
Load capacity:~ 469 kg~ 520 kg
Mini Countryman 2010 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem less than Mini Countryman 2014. Therefore, Mini Countryman 2014 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
The Mini Countryman 2010 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 66009200
Pros and Cons: Mini Countryman has
  • higher ground clearance
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mini Countryman has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv