Mini Countryman 2014 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 218 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 305 NM | 340 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 13.9 seconds | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 - 7.5 | 6.0 - 9.6 | |
|
Mini Countryman petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander. On average, Mini Countryman equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.11 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mini Countryman is smaller. Mini Countryman is 40 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Countryman is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1170 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Mini Countryman has 55 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Countryman is 0.3 metres more than that of the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`860 | ~ 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Countryman has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |