Mini Cooper 2010 vs Skoda Citigo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper engine produces 47 HP more power than Skoda Citigo, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Skoda Citigo. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Citigo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Cooper consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Cooper could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Cooper consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Citigo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Citigo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mini Cooper is larger, but lower. Mini Cooper is 16 cm longer than the Skoda Citigo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mini Cooper is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 160 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
680 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Citigo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mini Cooper has 91 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Citigo. This could mean that the Mini Cooper uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 0.9 metres more than that of the Skoda Citigo, which means Mini Cooper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mini Cooper has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Citigo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mini Cooper, so Mini Cooper quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper has
|
Skoda Citigo has
| |