Mini Cooper 2010 vs Nissan Micra 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper engine produces 42 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Cooper consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Cooper could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Cooper consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Micra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mini Countryman | Used also on Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mini Cooper engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mini Cooper is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mini Cooper is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 160 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
680 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage space. Mini Cooper has 105 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Mini Cooper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`525 | 1`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Mini Cooper has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Mini Cooper, so Mini Cooper quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |