Mini Cooper 2010 vs Chevrolet Spark 2010

 
Mini Cooper
2010 - 2013
Chevrolet Spark
2010 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 122 HP81 HP
Torque: 160 NM111 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds12.1 seconds
Mini Cooper is more dynamic to drive.
Mini Cooper engine produces 41 HP more power than Chevrolet Spark, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Chevrolet Spark. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.45.1
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km6.2 l/100km
The Chevrolet Spark is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mini Cooper consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Cooper could require 45 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Cooper consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Spark.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres35 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway830 km on highway
570 km with real consumption560 km with real consumption
Mini Cooper gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 7 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mini CountrymanUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mini Cooper might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mini Cooper engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.64 m
Width: 1.68 m1.60 m
Height: 1.41 m1.52 m
Mini Cooper is larger, but lower.
Mini Cooper is 8 cm longer than the Chevrolet Spark, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mini Cooper is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 160 litres170 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
680 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Mini Cooper has 10 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Spark. This could mean that the Mini Cooper uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 0.7 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Spark, which means Mini Cooper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5251`360
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

low
Mini Cooper has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Spark has serious deffects in 165 percent more cases than Mini Cooper, so Mini Cooper quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 70003200
Pros and Cons: Mini Cooper has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Chevrolet Spark has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv