Mini Cooper 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper engine produces 42 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 82 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mini Cooper consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mini Cooper over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mini Cooper consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Suzuki Swift can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.54 m | |
| Mini Cooper is 3 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mini Cooper is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 528 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mini Cooper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |