Mini Cooper 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mini Cooper and Suzuki Swift have the same engine power, but Mini Cooper torque is 40 NM more than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mini Cooper consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mini Cooper over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mini Cooper consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 530 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Suzuki Swift 2015 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.51 m | |
| Mini Cooper is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mini Cooper is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mini Cooper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`595 kg | 1`520 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`115 kg | 1`060 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 480 kg | 460 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |