Mini Cooper 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mini Cooper engine produces 4 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mini Cooper consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mini Cooper over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mini Cooper consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Suzuki Swift 2017 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM.
However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki Swift 2017 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mini Cooper is smaller. Mini Cooper is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mini Cooper is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 266 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage space. Mini Cooper has 55 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mini Cooper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mini Cooper scores higher in safety tests. The Mini Cooper scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |