Mini Cooper 2013 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper engine produces 56 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 94 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Cooper consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Cooper could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Cooper consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Mini Cooper is larger, but lower. Mini Cooper is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mini Cooper is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mini Cooper has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. This could mean that the Mini Cooper uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Mini Cooper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |