Mini Cooper 2013 vs Mini Countryman 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper engine produces 14 HP more power than Mini Countryman, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mini Countryman. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mini Cooper is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Cooper consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman, which means that by driving the Mini Cooper over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Cooper consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 530 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | 149 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Countryman can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mini Countryman version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Mini Countryman 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mini Cooper is smaller. Mini Cooper is 28 cm shorter than the Mini Countryman, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Cooper is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
|
Mini Countryman has more luggage space. Mini Cooper has 139 litres less trunk space than the Mini Countryman. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman, which means Mini Cooper can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`595 | 1`765 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mini Countryman scores higher in safety tests. The Mini Countryman scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mini Countryman has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mini Cooper has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mini Countryman, so Mini Countryman quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |