Mini Cooper 2010 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mini Cooper is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Alfa Romeo MiTo is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 - 122 HP | 78 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 270 NM | 120 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 10.4 seconds | 7.5 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.8 - 6.4 | 4.3 - 6.5 | |
|
Mini Cooper petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo MiTo. On average, Mini Cooper equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mini Cooper is smaller. Mini Cooper is 34 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo MiTo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Cooper is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 160 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
680 litres | no data | |
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has more luggage space. Mini Cooper has 110 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo MiTo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, which means Mini Cooper can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`554 | ~ 1`629 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper has
|
Alfa Romeo MiTo has
| |