Mini Cooper S 2012 vs Land Rover Freelander 2012

 
Mini Cooper S
2012 - 2013
Land Rover Freelander
2012 - 2014
Body: HatchbackCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 211 HP240 HP
Torque: 280 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.8 seconds
Mini Cooper S engine produces 29 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Land Rover Freelander.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data9.6
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres70 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 3.73 m4.50 m
Width: 1.68 m1.91 m
Height: 1.41 m1.74 m
Mini Cooper S is smaller.
Mini Cooper S is 77 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 23 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Cooper S is 33 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 160 litres405 litres
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space.
Mini Cooper S has 245 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mini Cooper S is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Mini Cooper S can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`505
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 78008200
Pros and Cons: Mini Cooper S has
  • better manoeuvrability
Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv