Mini Cooper S 2010 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005

 
Mini Cooper S
2010 - 2013
Volkswagen Fox
2005 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 184 HP55 HP
Torque: 260 NM106 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds18 seconds
Mini Cooper S is more dynamic to drive.
Mini Cooper S engine produces 129 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 154 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper S reaches 100 km/h speed 10.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km6.8 l/100km
The Volkswagen Fox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mini Cooper S consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Cooper S could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Cooper S consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1000 km on highway
590 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.73 m3.83 m
Width: 1.68 m1.66 m
Height: 1.41 m1.54 m
Mini Cooper S is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Fox, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mini Cooper S is 13 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 160 litres260 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1016 litres
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space.
Mini Cooper S has 100 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mini Cooper S is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6151`480
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 80001800
Pros and Cons: Mini Cooper S has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Volkswagen Fox has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv