Mini Cooper S 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper S engine produces 98 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 162 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper S reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mini Cooper S consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mini Cooper S over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mini Cooper S consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mini Cooper S engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.54 m | |
| Mini Cooper S and Suzuki Swift are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 528 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper S is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mini Cooper S can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper S has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |