Mini Cooper S 2013 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper S engine produces 102 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper S reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Cooper S consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Cooper S could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Cooper S consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mini Cooper S engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mini Cooper S is 1 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mini Cooper S is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 947 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mini Cooper S has 54 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. This could mean that the Mini Cooper S uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper S is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mini Cooper S can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper S has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |