Mini Cooper S 2013 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 88 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper S engine produces 121 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 192 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper S reaches 100 km/h speed 6.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 5.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mini Cooper S consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Cooper S could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mini Cooper S consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mini Cooper S engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mini Cooper S engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Mini Cooper S is larger, but lower. Mini Cooper S is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mini Cooper S is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 912 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mini Cooper S has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. This could mean that the Mini Cooper S uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper S is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Mini Cooper S can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper S has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |