Mini Cooper S 2018 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper S is more dynamic to drive. Mini Cooper S engine produces 102 HP more power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Mini Cooper S reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.3 | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mini Cooper S consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mini Cooper S could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Swift gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mini Cooper S can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mini Cooper S version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.85 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mini Cooper S is 1 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Mini Cooper S is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
731 litres | 947 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mini Cooper S uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Swift (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mini Cooper S is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mini Cooper S can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`635 kg | 1`365 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`220 kg | 840 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 415 kg | 525 kg | |
| Mini Cooper S load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Suzuki Swift. Therefore, Suzuki Swift is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper S has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |