Mini Cooper S 2010 vs Mercedes SLK 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Cabrio | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Mini Cooper S is available with front wheel drive, while Mercedes SLK can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 - 211 HP | 136 - 193 HP | |
Torque: | 260 - 280 NM | 190 - 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 - 7.2 seconds | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 7.1 | 9.1 - 9.5 | |
Mini Cooper S petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.73 m | 4.00 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.29 m | |
Mini Cooper S is smaller, but higher. Mini Cooper S is 27 cm shorter than the Mercedes SLK, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mini Cooper S is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 160 litres | 145 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Mini Cooper S has 15 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. The Mercedes SLK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mini Cooper S is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`595 | ~ 1`548 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mini Cooper S has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |