Mercedes SLK 1996 vs Mercedes CLK 1999

 
Mercedes SLK
1996 - 2000
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol3.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 136 HP224 HP
Torque: 190 NM315 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.3 seconds8.3 seconds
Mercedes CLK is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes SLK engine produces 88 HP less power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Due to the lower power, Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.110.9
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes SLK consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 580 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
760 km on highway750 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 580'000 km700'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLKInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase, Mercedes SL
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.57 m
Width: 1.72 m1.72 m
Height: 1.29 m1.38 m
Mercedes SLK is 57 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes SLK is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 145 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
348 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5302`070
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Mercedes SLK has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes CLK has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 30004400
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv