Mercedes SLK 2001 vs Audi TT 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 354 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes SLK engine produces 104 HP more power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Audi TT. Thanks to more power Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.5 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes SLK consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes SLK could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes SLK consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 530 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 520 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi TT gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.27 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 3 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK has 35 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.6 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Mercedes SLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`755 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi TT has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Audi TT has
| |