Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes SLK 2000 engine produces 34 HP more power than Mercedes SLK 2004, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mercedes SLK 2004. Thanks to more power Mercedes SLK 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes SLK 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes SLK 2000 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes SLK 2000 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes SLK 2000 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes SLK 2004 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2000 is smaller. Mercedes SLK 2000 is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes SLK 2004, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK 2000 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2004 has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK 2000 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SLK 2004. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK 2000 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK 2004. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |