Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes SLK engine produces 4 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes SLK consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes SLK consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes SLK is 56 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes SLK is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
| |