Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Honda S2000 1999
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 197 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 208 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
Honda S2000 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes SLK engine produces 43 HP less power than Honda S2000, but torque is 72 NM more than Honda S2000. Due to the lower power, Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes SLK consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda S2000, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes SLK consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda S2000. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.01 m | 4.14 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.26 m | 1.28 m | |
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 13 cm shorter than the Honda S2000, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda S2000. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | 1`220 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 23 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Honda S2000 has
| |