Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes SLK engine produces 4 HP more power than Chevrolet Camaro, but torque is 25 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Thanks to more power Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 12.4 | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes SLK consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 90 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Mercedes SLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`645 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |