Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes SLK engine produces 27 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.4 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes SLK consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes SLK consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes SLK is 56 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes SLK is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`980 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
| |