Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mercedes SLK engine produces 30 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Despite less power, Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 12.4 | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes SLK consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 610 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 90 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Mercedes SLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |