Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo Spider is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes SLK engine produces 29 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Spider, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Alfa Romeo Spider. Due to the lower power, Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 11.0 | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes SLK consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Alfa Romeo Spider) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes SLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.28 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 27 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo Spider, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 110 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SLK has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes SLK has 35 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo Spider. The Alfa Romeo Spider may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.6 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo Spider, which means Mercedes SLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`395 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Alfa Romeo Spider has
| |