Mercedes SLK 2004 vs BMW Z4 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
BMW Z4 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes SLK engine produces 7 HP less power than BMW Z4, but torque is 30 NM more than BMW Z4. Due to the lower power, Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
760 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW Z3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes SLK might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.09 m | 4.09 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes SLK and BMW Z4 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 300 litres | |
BMW Z4 has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK has 92 litres less trunk space than the BMW Z4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW Z4, which means Mercedes SLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 1`550 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | above average | |
Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW Z4 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 7200 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |