Mercedes SLK 2004 vs Audi TT 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes SLK engine produces 17 HP less power than Audi TT, but torque is 5 NM more than Audi TT. Despite less power, Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes SLK consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes SLK consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes SLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes SLK 2004 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is larger, but lower. Mercedes SLK is 5 cm longer than the Audi TT, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 220 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mercedes SLK has 12 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the Mercedes SLK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Mercedes SLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 1`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mercedes SLK has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi TT, so Mercedes SLK quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7400 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Audi TT has
| |