Mercedes SLK 2008 vs BMW Z4 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 204 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
BMW Z4 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes SLK engine produces 20 HP less power than BMW Z4, whereas torque is 10 NM less than BMW Z4. Due to the lower power, Mercedes SLK reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The BMW Z4 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mercedes SLK consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes SLK consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW Z4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes SLK engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes SLK might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mercedes SLK 2008 1.8 engine: The most notable issue with this engine is the sticking of exhaust valves due to carbon buildup. Another significant problem is the unreliable timing chain, which can stretch by 100,000 km. Early symptoms of a ... More about Mercedes SLK 2008 1.8 engine BMW Z4 2009 2.5 engine: On this engine, the valve seals and crankcase breather valve diaphragm tend to fail after 80-100 000 km, leading to increased oil consumption. It is recommended to choose engines manufactured in the last years ... More about BMW Z4 2009 2.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.10 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
Mercedes SLK is smaller, but slightly higher. Mercedes SLK is 14 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 180 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 310 litres | |
Mercedes SLK has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes SLK has 28 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 1`735 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
BMW Z4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes SLK has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than BMW Z4, so BMW Z4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 13 000 | 18 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |