Mercedes SLK 1996 vs Mini Cooper S 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes SLK
1996 - 2000
Mini Cooper S
2010 - 2013
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mercedes SLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Mini Cooper S can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.31.6

Performance

Power: 136 - 193 HP184 - 211 HP
Torque: 190 - 280 NM260 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 - 9.7 seconds6.5 - 7.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.1 - 9.55.8 - 7.1
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mini Cooper S.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m3.73 m
Width: 1.72 m1.68 m
Height: 1.29 m1.41 m
Mercedes SLK is larger, but lower.
Mercedes SLK is 27 cm longer than the Mini Cooper S, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 145 litres160 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
348 litresno data
Despite its longer length, Mercedes SLK has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mini Cooper S. This could mean that the Mercedes SLK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper S.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`548~ 1`595
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high
no data
Average price (€): 30008800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SLK has
  • lower price
Mini Cooper S has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv