Mercedes SLK 1996 vs Mini Cooper S 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mercedes SLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Mini Cooper S can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 - 193 HP | 184 - 211 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 280 NM | 260 - 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | 6.5 - 7.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.5 | 5.8 - 7.1 | |
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mini Cooper S. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 3.73 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.68 m | |
Height: | 1.29 m | 1.41 m | |
Mercedes SLK is larger, but lower. Mercedes SLK is 27 cm longer than the Mini Cooper S, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 12 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 160 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
Despite its longer length, Mercedes SLK has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mini Cooper S. This could mean that the Mercedes SLK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper S. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 1`595 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mini Cooper S has
| |