Mercedes SLK 1996 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 193 HP | 163 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 280 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.5 | 8.7 - 12.0 | |
|
Mercedes SLK 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK 1996 is smaller. Mercedes SLK 1996 is 9 cm shorter than the Mercedes SLK 2004, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2004 has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK 1996 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SLK 2004. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 1`761 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |