Mercedes SLK 1996 vs Mazda MX-5 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 193 HP | 126 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 280 NM | 167 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | 8.2 - 9.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.5 | 7.3 - 8.8 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda MX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.26 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes SLK and Mazda MX-5 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 150 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
| Mercedes SLK has 5 litres less trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Mercedes SLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |