Mercedes SLK 1996 vs BMW 6 series 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 3.0 - 4.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 193 HP | 258 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 280 NM | 300 - 490 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | 5.7 - 7.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 9.5 | 9.6 - 13.0 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 6 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is smaller. Mercedes SLK is 82 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | 350 litres | |
|
BMW 6 series has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK has 155 litres less trunk space than the BMW 6 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 6 series (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Mercedes SLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`548 | ~ 2`194 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |