Mercedes SLK 2000 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 1.8 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 354 HP | 163 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 450 NM | 240 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 - 8.5 seconds | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 11.2 | 8.7 - 12.0 | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK 2004. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.01 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.27 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2000 is smaller. Mercedes SLK 2000 is 8 cm shorter than the Mercedes SLK 2004, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLK 2000 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 145 litres | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
348 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2004 has more luggage space. Mercedes SLK 2000 has 63 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes SLK 2004. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK 2000 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK 2004. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`661 | ~ 1`761 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |