Mercedes SLK 2004 vs Chrysler Crossfire 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.4 | 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 360 HP | 218 - 335 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 510 NM | 310 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | 5.3 - 6.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 12.0 | 10.1 - 11.0 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Crossfire. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes SLK is 3 cm longer than the Chrysler Crossfire, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 105 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 190 litres | |
|
Mercedes SLK has more luggage capacity. Mercedes SLK has 103 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.2 metres more than that of the Chrysler Crossfire. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`761 | ~ 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
| |