Mercedes SLK 2004 vs Audi TT 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes SLK is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.4 | 1.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 360 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 510 NM | 210 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 8.3 seconds | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 12.0 | 8.2 - 11.0 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.09 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK is larger, but lower. Mercedes SLK is 5 cm longer than the Audi TT, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLK is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 220 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mercedes SLK has 12 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. This could mean that the Mercedes SLK uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.5 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Mercedes SLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`761 | ~ 1`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Audi TT has
| |