Mercedes SLK 2008 vs Mercedes SLK 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.4 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 360 HP | 136 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 510 NM | 190 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.9 - 7.9 seconds | 7.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 12.0 | 9.1 - 9.5 | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2008 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLK 1996. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.10 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.29 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2008 is larger. Mercedes SLK 2008 is 10 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK 1996, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 208 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 348 litres | |
|
Mercedes SLK 2008 has more luggage capacity. Mercedes SLK 2008 has 63 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK 1996. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`771 | ~ 1`548 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLK has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |