Mercedes SLK 2011 vs Mercedes SLC 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 5.5 | 1.6 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 - 422 HP | 156 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 540 NM | 250 - 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 7.3 seconds | 4.7 - 8.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 - 8.4 | 5.6 - 7.8 | |
|
Mercedes SLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes SLC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.30 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes SLK and Mercedes SLC are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
335 litres | 335 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.52 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SLK is 0.02 metres less than that of the Mercedes SLC. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`846 kg | ~ 1`823 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`536 kg | ~ 1`438 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 310 kg | ~ 385 kg | |
| Mercedes SLK load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Mercedes SLC. Therefore, Mercedes SLC is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes SLC has
| |