Mercedes SLC 2016 vs Audi A3 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
Mercedes SLC engine produces 6 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Audi A3. Despite less power, Mercedes SLC reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A3) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes SLC) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi Q3 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes SLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mercedes SLC 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes SLC 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.13 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.41 m | |
Mercedes SLC is 29 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLC is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 320 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
335 litres | 680 litres | |
Audi A3 has more luggage space. Mercedes SLC has 95 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 345 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.52 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLC is 0.38 metres less than that of the Audi A3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`965 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
Mercedes SLC has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A3 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mercedes SLC, so Mercedes SLC quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLC has
|
Audi A3 has
| |