Mercedes SLC 2016 vs Audi TT 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 5.5 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes SLC engine produces 61 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Mercedes SLC reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes SLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes SLC consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes SLC consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes SLC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes SLC 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes SLC 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.13 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Mercedes SLC is smaller. Mercedes SLC is 6 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLC is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
335 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mercedes SLC has 55 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.52 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`795 kg | 1`810 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mercedes SLC has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi TT has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mercedes SLC, so Mercedes SLC quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLC has
|
Audi TT has
| |