Mercedes SLC 2016 vs Audi TT 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Mercedes SLC engine produces 13 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Audi TT. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi TT is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mercedes SLC consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Mercedes SLC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes SLC consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi TT) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes SLC) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.13 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Mercedes SLC is smaller. Mercedes SLC is 6 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SLC is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
335 litres | no data | |
|
Audi TT has more luggage space. Mercedes SLC has 55 litres less trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.52 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`795 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Mercedes SLC has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi TT has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mercedes SLC, so Mercedes SLC quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLC has
|
Audi TT has
| |