Mercedes SLC 2016 vs Audi A3 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes SLC
2016 - 2020
Audi A3
2016 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mercedes SLC is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi A3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 3.01.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 156 - 367 HP110 - 190 HP
Torque: 250 - 520 NM200 - 380 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.7 - 8.1 seconds6.9 - 11.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.6 - 7.85.2
Mercedes SLC petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.13 m4.42 m
Width: 1.81 m1.79 m
Height: 1.30 m1.41 m
Mercedes SLC is 29 cm shorter than the Audi A3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLC is 11 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 225 litres320 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
335 litres845 litres
Audi A3 has more luggage space.
Mercedes SLC has 95 litres less trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 510 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.52 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLC is 0.48 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Mercedes SLC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`823~ 1`937
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Average price (€): no datano data
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SLC has
  • fewer faults
Audi A3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv