Mercedes SLC 2016 vs BMW Z4 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 - 367 HP | 156 - 306 HP | |
Torque: | 250 - 520 NM | 270 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 8.1 seconds | 5.1 - 8.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 - 7.8 | 6.8 - 9.4 | |
Mercedes SLC petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW Z4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.13 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
Mercedes SLC is 11 cm shorter than the BMW Z4, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SLC is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 225 litres | 180 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
335 litres | no data | |
Mercedes SLC has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes SLC has 45 litres more trunk space than the BMW Z4. The BMW Z4 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.52 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes SLC is 0.18 metres less than that of the BMW Z4. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`823 | ~ 1`765 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | high | |
Average price (€): | no data | 23 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes SLC has
|
BMW Z4 has
| |