Mercedes SL 2012 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 335 HP | 405 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 556 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes SL engine produces 70 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 76 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Mercedes SL is smaller. Mercedes SL is 22 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SL is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 241 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
381 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage space. Mercedes SL has 79 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Mercedes SL can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 000 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |