Mercedes SL 2004 vs Mercedes SLK 2004

 
Mercedes SL
2004 - 2006
Mercedes SLK
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 5.0 Petrol3.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Double-row timing chainDouble-row timing chain

Performance

Power: 306 HP272 HP
Torque: 460 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.3 seconds5.6 seconds
Mercedes SL engine produces 34 HP more power than Mercedes SLK, whereas torque is 110 NM more than Mercedes SLK. Despite the higher power, Mercedes SL reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.710.6
The Mercedes SLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes SL consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes SL could require 315 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway870 km on highway
Mercedes SLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km450'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes CLSInstalled on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes SLK might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.54 m4.09 m
Width: 1.82 m1.79 m
Height: 1.30 m1.30 m
Mercedes SL is larger.
Mercedes SL is 45 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 235 litres208 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
317 litresno data
Mercedes SL has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes SL has 27 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means Mercedes SL can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`780
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Mercedes SLK has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes SL has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 17 2007200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SL has
  • more power
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Mercedes SLK has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv