Mercedes SL 2002 vs Mercedes CLK 1999

 
Mercedes SL
2002 - 2006
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 3.7 Petrol3.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 245 HP224 HP
Torque: 350 NM315 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 seconds8.3 seconds
Mercedes SL is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes SL engine produces 21 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Mercedes SL reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.510.9
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes SL consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes SL could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 690 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway750 km on highway
Mercedes SL gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 500'000 km700'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klaseInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes S klase, Mercedes SL
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.54 m4.57 m
Width: 1.82 m1.72 m
Height: 1.30 m1.38 m
Mercedes SL is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes SL is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 235 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
317 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0502`070
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Average price (€): 17 2004400
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SL has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv