Mercedes SL 2012 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011

 
Mercedes SL
2012 - 2016
Chevrolet Camaro
2011 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.5 Petrol3.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 306 HP315 HP
Torque: 370 NM370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.9 secondsn/a seconds
Mercedes SL engine produces 9 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.810.6
The Mercedes SL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes SL consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes SL over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres71 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway870 km on highway
Mercedes SL gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.84 m
Width: 1.88 m1.92 m
Height: 1.32 m1.38 m
Mercedes SL is smaller.
Mercedes SL is 22 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes SL is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 241 litres289 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
381 litres290 litres
Mercedes SL has 48 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes SL (by 91 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes SL is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means Mercedes SL can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`065no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 00022 200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes SL has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Chevrolet Camaro has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv